+1 Hakikur At 13:45 05-09-2013, Nicolas Adam wrote: >+1 > >Nicolas > >On 05/09/2013 6:50 AM, Amr Elsadr wrote: >>Thanks Avri. I'm happy with all three statements and the addition >>you suggested. >> >>Thanks again. >> >>Amr >> >>On Sep 5, 2013, at 6:42 AM, Avri Doria <[log in to unmask]> wrote: >> >>>Hi >>> >>>The reply period for the delay of the GNSO proposal ends on 6 >>>June. At todays' meeting there was a strong sentiment in favor of >>>NCSG endorsing the NPOC statement. >>> >>>What do people think about the following? >>> >>>I will ask the NCSG Policy Committee to decide by 6 September >>>whether they beleive this should be submitted in the NCSG's name. >>> >>>Please comment. >>>Any objections? >>>Any edits? >>> >>>----- >>> >>> >>>NCSG wishes to support and endorse the statement submitted by NPOC >>><http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-gnso-review-15jul13/msg00003.html> >>>against any delay in the beginning the next cycle of GNSO reviews. >>> >>>The NCSG also support comments submitted by: >>> >>>- ISPCP >>><http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-gnso-review-15jul13/msg00002.html> >>>- Google >>><http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-gnso-review-15jul13/msg00001.html> >>> >>>against any delay in the beginning of the next cyle of GNSO reviews. >>> >>>The NCSG wishes to add the following comments to this Reply: >>> >>>We beleive that with the ATRT2 to publish its report by the end of >>>2013, the timing is perfect for the process to begin early in 2014 >>>without any further delay. >>> >>> >>>----- >>> >>>I can't take complete silence as consent. silence only works as >>>consent when other people are being noisy. >>> >>>so please say something >>> >>>avri