+1 agree with Avri's statements. -ron On Thu, 5 Sep 2013, Avri Doria wrote: > Hi > > The reply period for the delay of the GNSO proposal ends on 6 June. At todays' meeting there was a strong sentiment in favor of NCSG endorsing the NPOC statement. > > What do people think about the following? > > I will ask the NCSG Policy Committee to decide by 6 September whether they beleive this should be submitted in the NCSG's name. > > Please comment. > Any objections? > Any edits? > > ----- > > > NCSG wishes to support and endorse the statement submitted by NPOC <http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-gnso-review-15jul13/msg00003.html> against any delay in the beginning the next cycle of GNSO reviews. > > The NCSG also support comments submitted by: > > - ISPCP <http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-gnso-review-15jul13/msg00002.html> > - Google <http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-gnso-review-15jul13/msg00001.html> > > against any delay in the beginning of the next cyle of GNSO reviews. > > The NCSG wishes to add the following comments to this Reply: > > We beleive that with the ATRT2 to publish its report by the end of 2013, the timing is perfect for the process to begin early in 2014 without any further delay. > > > ----- > > I can't take complete silence as consent. silence only works as consent when other people are being noisy. > > so please say something > > avri >