I too support Avri's statement. Maria On 5 September 2013 22:25, Ron Wickersham <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > +1 > > agree with Avri's statements. > > -ron > > On Thu, 5 Sep 2013, Avri Doria wrote: > > Hi >> >> The reply period for the delay of the GNSO proposal ends on 6 June. At >> todays' meeting there was a strong sentiment in favor of NCSG endorsing the >> NPOC statement. >> >> What do people think about the following? >> >> I will ask the NCSG Policy Committee to decide by 6 September whether >> they beleive this should be submitted in the NCSG's name. >> >> Please comment. >> Any objections? >> Any edits? >> >> ----- >> >> >> NCSG wishes to support and endorse the statement submitted by NPOC < >> http://forum.icann.org/lists/**comments-gnso-review-15jul13/** >> msg00003.html<http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-gnso-review-15jul13/msg00003.html>> >> against any delay in the beginning the next cycle of GNSO reviews. >> >> The NCSG also support comments submitted by: >> >> - ISPCP <http://forum.icann.org/lists/**comments-gnso-review-15jul13/** >> msg00002.html<http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-gnso-review-15jul13/msg00002.html> >> > >> - Google <http://forum.icann.org/lists/**comments-gnso-review-15jul13/** >> msg00001.html<http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-gnso-review-15jul13/msg00001.html> >> > >> >> against any delay in the beginning of the next cyle of GNSO reviews. >> >> The NCSG wishes to add the following comments to this Reply: >> >> We beleive that with the ATRT2 to publish its report by the end of 2013, >> the timing is perfect for the process to begin early in 2014 without any >> further delay. >> >> >> ----- >> >> I can't take complete silence as consent. silence only works as consent >> when other people are being noisy. >> >> so please say something >> >> avri >> >>