+1 Nicolas On 05/09/2013 6:50 AM, Amr Elsadr wrote: > Thanks Avri. I'm happy with all three statements and the addition you suggested. > > Thanks again. > > Amr > > On Sep 5, 2013, at 6:42 AM, Avri Doria <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > >> Hi >> >> The reply period for the delay of the GNSO proposal ends on 6 June. At todays' meeting there was a strong sentiment in favor of NCSG endorsing the NPOC statement. >> >> What do people think about the following? >> >> I will ask the NCSG Policy Committee to decide by 6 September whether they beleive this should be submitted in the NCSG's name. >> >> Please comment. >> Any objections? >> Any edits? >> >> ----- >> >> >> NCSG wishes to support and endorse the statement submitted by NPOC <http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-gnso-review-15jul13/msg00003.html> against any delay in the beginning the next cycle of GNSO reviews. >> >> The NCSG also support comments submitted by: >> >> - ISPCP <http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-gnso-review-15jul13/msg00002.html> >> - Google <http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-gnso-review-15jul13/msg00001.html> >> >> against any delay in the beginning of the next cyle of GNSO reviews. >> >> The NCSG wishes to add the following comments to this Reply: >> >> We beleive that with the ATRT2 to publish its report by the end of 2013, the timing is perfect for the process to begin early in 2014 without any further delay. >> >> >> ----- >> >> I can't take complete silence as consent. silence only works as consent when other people are being noisy. >> >> so please say something >> >> avri