A further paper for discussion tomorrow: please note the proposes a "non-traditional WG approach" to support staff work. Personally I do not favour this, but please provide your thoughts so that Councillors can discuss at the GNSO meeting
Kind regards
Joy


-------- Original Message --------
Subject: [council] GNSO Metrics & Reporting (MetRep) for 5 Sept GNSO Council Meeting
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2013 13:50:14 -0700
From: Berry Cobb <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
CC: <[log in to unmask]>


Jonathan and All,

 

Please find attached a document regarding the GNSO Metrics & Reporting WG.  As you may recall, we have an issue with limited volunteers within the GNSO for this effort, which is not considered sufficiently representative.  At the GNSO Council meeting in Durban, the staff was tasked (Action Item #7) with developing a possible alternative approach to the Uniformity of Reporting Final Issue Report recommendations approved in Beijing.  This MetRep document is intended to provide a possible way forward for the GNSO Council to consider.

 

Item 6: DISCUSSION – Metrics and Reporting WG (10 mins)

Despite the unanimous support for this resolution, only six volunteers (3 GNSO, 3 ALAC) have signed up for this effort to date, which is not considered sufficiently representative to kick off the DT. Apart from renewing the call for volunteers or delaying this effort, the GNSO Council could consider, as this is a non-PDP WG, to explore an alternative approach to addressing this issue while still respecting the multi-stakeholder approach, but not necessarily requiring the formation of a DT or WG. 

Please let me know if you require additional information or if you have any questions.

 

Thank you.  B

 

Berry Cobb

Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN)

720.839.5735

[log in to unmask]

@berrycobb