On Sep 5, 2013, at 6:42 AM, Avri Doria <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

Hi

The reply period for the delay of the GNSO proposal ends on 6 June. At todays' meeting there was a strong sentiment in favor of NCSG endorsing the NPOC statement.

What do people think about the following?

Look fine to me.

Thanks,

Bill

I will ask the NCSG Policy Committee to decide by 6 September whether they beleive this should be submitted in the NCSG's name.

Please comment.
Any objections?
Any edits?

-----

NCSG wishes to support and endorse the statement submitted by NPOC <http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-gnso-review-15jul13/msg00003.html> against any delay in the beginning the next cycle of GNSO reviews.

The NCSG also support comments submitted by:

- ISPCP <http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-gnso-review-15jul13/msg00002.html>
- Google <http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-gnso-review-15jul13/msg00001.html>

against any delay in the beginning of the next cyle of GNSO reviews.

The NCSG wishes to add the following comments to this Reply:

We beleive that with the ATRT2 to publish its report by the end of 2013, the timing is perfect for the process to begin early in 2014 without any further delay.

-----

I can't take complete silence as consent. silence only works as consent when other people are being noisy.

so please say something

avri