Of course I mean 6 September. http://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/gnso-review-15jul13-en.htm avri Ps.. I really wish the email system for this group was able to accept more than one address for a sender. Begin forwarded message: > From: "Syracuse University LISTSERV Server (16.0)" <[log in to unmask]> > Subject: Rejected posting to [log in to unmask] > Date: 5 September 2013 07:49:51 EDT > To: [log in to unmask] > > You are not authorized to send mail to the NCSG-DISCUSS list from your > [log in to unmask] account. You might be authorized to post to the list from another > account, or perhaps when using another mail program configured to use a > different email address. However, LISTSERV has no way to associate this other > account or address with yours. If you need assistance or if you have any > questions regarding the policy of the NCSG-DISCUSS list, please contact the > list owners at [log in to unmask] > > From: Avri Doria <[log in to unmask]> > Subject: Re: [NCSG-Discuss] Reply period closing on Delay of GNSO review decsion > Date: 5 September 2013 07:49:44 EDT > To: [log in to unmask] > > > Of course I mean 6 September. > > http://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/gnso-review-15jul13-en.htm > > avri > > On 5 Sep 2013, at 00:42, Avri Doria wrote: > >> Hi >> >> The reply period for the delay of the GNSO proposal ends on 6 June. At todays' meeting there was a strong sentiment in favor of NCSG endorsing the NPOC statement. >> >> What do people think about the following? >> >> I will ask the NCSG Policy Committee to decide by 6 September whether they beleive this should be submitted in the NCSG's name. >> >> Please comment. >> Any objections? >> Any edits? >> >> ----- >> >> >> NCSG wishes to support and endorse the statement submitted by NPOC <http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-gnso-review-15jul13/msg00003.html> against any delay in the beginning the next cycle of GNSO reviews. >> >> The NCSG also support comments submitted by: >> >> - ISPCP <http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-gnso-review-15jul13/msg00002.html> >> - Google <http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-gnso-review-15jul13/msg00001.html> >> >> against any delay in the beginning of the next cyle of GNSO reviews. >> >> The NCSG wishes to add the following comments to this Reply: >> >> We beleive that with the ATRT2 to publish its report by the end of 2013, the timing is perfect for the process to begin early in 2014 without any further delay. >> >> >> ----- >> >> I can't take complete silence as consent. silence only works as consent when other people are being noisy. >> >> so please say something >> >> avri >> > > >