Date: 5 September 2013 07:49:51 EDT
You are not authorized to send mail to the NCSG-DISCUSS list from your
[log in to unmask] account. You might be authorized to post to the list from another
account, or perhaps when using another mail program configured to use a
different email address. However, LISTSERV has no way to associate this other
account or address with yours. If you need assistance or if you have any
questions regarding the policy of the NCSG-DISCUSS list, please contact the
list owners at [log in to unmask].
Subject: Re: [NCSG-Discuss] Reply period closing on Delay of GNSO review decsion
Date: 5 September 2013 07:49:44 EDT
Of course I mean 6 September.
http://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/gnso-review-15jul13-en.htm
avri
On 5 Sep 2013, at 00:42, Avri Doria wrote:
Hi
The reply period for the delay of the GNSO proposal ends on 6 June. At todays' meeting there was a strong sentiment in favor of NCSG endorsing the NPOC statement.
What do people think about the following?
I will ask the NCSG Policy Committee to decide by 6 September whether they beleive this should be submitted in the NCSG's name.
Please comment.
Any objections?
Any edits?
-----
NCSG wishes to support and endorse the statement submitted by NPOC <http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-gnso-review-15jul13/msg00003.html> against any delay in the beginning the next cycle of GNSO reviews.
The NCSG also support comments submitted by:
- ISPCP <http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-gnso-review-15jul13/msg00002.html>
- Google <http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-gnso-review-15jul13/msg00001.html>
against any delay in the beginning of the next cyle of GNSO reviews.
The NCSG wishes to add the following comments to this Reply:
We beleive that with the ATRT2 to publish its report by the end of 2013, the timing is perfect for the process to begin early in 2014 without any further delay.
-----
I can't take complete silence as consent. silence only works as consent when other people are being noisy.
so please say something
avri