+1

Roy

From: NCSG-Discuss [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of William Drake
Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2013 4:31 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [NCSG-Discuss] Reply period closing on Delay of GNSO review decsion

Hi

On Sep 5, 2013, at 6:42 AM, Avri Doria <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

Hi

The reply period for the delay of the GNSO proposal ends on 6 June.  At todays' meeting there was a strong sentiment in favor of NCSG endorsing the NPOC statement.

What do people think about the following?

Look fine to me.

Thanks,

Bill

I will ask the NCSG Policy  Committee to decide by  6 September whether they beleive this should be submitted in the NCSG's name.

Please comment.
Any objections?
Any edits?

-----


NCSG wishes to support and endorse the statement submitted by NPOC <http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-gnso-review-15jul13/msg00003.html> against any delay in the beginning the next cycle of GNSO reviews.

The NCSG also support comments submitted by:

- ISPCP <http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-gnso-review-15jul13/msg00002.html>
- Google <http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-gnso-review-15jul13/msg00001.html>

against any delay in the beginning of the next cyle of GNSO reviews.

The NCSG wishes to add the following comments to this Reply:

We beleive that with the ATRT2 to publish its report by the end of 2013, the timing is perfect for the process to begin early in 2014 without any further delay.


-----

I can't take complete silence as consent.  silence only works as consent when other people are being noisy.

so please say something

avri