last one - this particularly for discussion at our policy meeting
cheers
joy


-------- Original Message --------
Subject: RE: [council] TMCH RPM Requirements draft document
Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2013 11:16:56 +0100
From: Jonathan Robinson <[log in to unmask]>
Reply-To: <[log in to unmask]>
Organisation: Afilias
To: 'Volker Greimann' <[log in to unmask]>, 'Marika Konings' <[log in to unmask]>
CC: 'Glen de Saint Géry' <[log in to unmask]>, <[log in to unmask]>


All,

 

We have a full agenda developing for the 10 October 2013. 

 

It will be helpful to have other comments on this along the lines of:

 

1.       Is this an issue for the Council?

2.       If so:

a.       Do you have similarly felt or related / connected concerns?

b.      Is this a unusual / unique / a precedent?

c.       What should the Council be doing about it?

 

Thanks,

 

 

Jonathan

 

From: Volker Greimann [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: 01 October 2013 09:33
To: Marika Konings
Cc: Glen de Saint Géry; [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [council] TMCH RPM Requirements draft document

 

Hi Marika,

thank you for that clarification. While this relieves part of my concern, I still feel that "baking" a single constituency into such a process and handing out special benefits is not the proper procedure for a multi-stakeholder organization, even if it is an opt-in process for the applicant.

Best,

Volker

Dear All,

 

Please find below a response from Cyrus Namazi in relation to the paragraph referred to by Volker.

 

Best regards,

 

Marika

 

In response to community input, the TMCH Requirements were revised to allow registry operators the ability to submit applications to conduct launch programs.  In response to the large number of Geo TLDs who voiced similar concerns, the IPC publicly stated that it would be willing to work with Geo TLDs to develop mutually acceptable language for Geo TLD launch programs.  We viewed this proposal as a way for community members to work collectively to propose to ICANN a possible solution for an issue specifically affecting intellectual property rights-holders and Geo TLDs.  Any such proposal will be subject to ICANN's review and ICANN has expressly stated that any such proposal may be subject to public comment in which other interested community members may participate. This is captured in Section 4.5.3.

 

As an alternative, applicants can unilaterally apply for a program exemption under another provision of the requirements (Section 4.5.2).  IPC was added to facilitate the discussion; not a condition to that requirement. 

 

From: Volker Greimann <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Monday 30 September 2013 19:03
To: Glen de Saint Géry <[log in to unmask]>
Cc: "[log in to unmask]" <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: [council] TMCH RPM Requirements draft document

 

Dear fellow councillors,

in the last week ICANN has released a final draft version of the TMCH RPM Requirements, which contains in section 4.5.3 a paragraph that I find to be questionable:


4.5.3If registry operators that indicated in their applications for their TLDs that their TLD would be a geographic name (“Geo TLDs”) and representatives of the Intellectual Property Constituency recommend to ICANN the creation of a registration program (...)

 

Further, stakeholder groups and constituencies may change over time, so referencing one in such a process description may cause problems down the line.

I feel this topic needs to be raised on the council level as this is only the most recent example of ICANN staff acting unilaterally in favoring one interest over others.

-- 
 
Best regards,
 
Volker Greimann 

-->




-- 
Bei weiteren Fragen stehen wir Ihnen gerne zur Verfügung.
 
Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
 
Volker A. Greimann
- Rechtsabteilung -
 
Key-Systems GmbH
Im Oberen Werk 1
66386 St. Ingbert
Tel.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 901
Fax.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 851
Email: [log in to unmask]
 
Web: www.key-systems.net / www.RRPproxy.net
www.domaindiscount24.com / www.BrandShelter.com
 
Folgen Sie uns bei Twitter oder werden Sie unser Fan bei Facebook:
www.facebook.com/KeySystems
www.twitter.com/key_systems
 
Geschäftsführer: Alexander Siffrin
Handelsregister Nr.: HR B 18835 - Saarbruecken 
Umsatzsteuer ID.: DE211006534
 
Member of the KEYDRIVE GROUP
www.keydrive.lu 
 
Der Inhalt dieser Nachricht ist vertraulich und nur für den angegebenen Empfänger bestimmt. Jede Form der Kenntnisgabe, Veröffentlichung oder Weitergabe an Dritte durch den Empfänger ist unzulässig. Sollte diese Nachricht nicht für Sie bestimmt sein, so bitten wir Sie, sich mit uns per E-Mail oder telefonisch in Verbindung zu setzen.
 
--------------------------------------------
 
Should you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact us.
 
Best regards,
 
Volker A. Greimann
- legal department -
 
Key-Systems GmbH
Im Oberen Werk 1
66386 St. Ingbert
Tel.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 901
Fax.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 851
Email: [log in to unmask]
 
Web: www.key-systems.net / www.RRPproxy.net
www.domaindiscount24.com / www.BrandShelter.com
 
Follow us on Twitter or join our fan community on Facebook and stay updated:
www.facebook.com/KeySystems
www.twitter.com/key_systems
 
CEO: Alexander Siffrin
Registration No.: HR B 18835 - Saarbruecken 
V.A.T. ID.: DE211006534
 
Member of the KEYDRIVE GROUP
www.keydrive.lu 
 
This e-mail and its attachments is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. Furthermore it is not permitted to publish any content of this email. You must not use, disclose, copy, print or rely on this e-mail. If an addressing or transmission error has misdirected this e-mail, kindly notify the author by replying to this e-mail or contacting us by telephone.