RIghto! On 11 November 2013 16:22, Avri Doria <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > Hi, > > In my minds ear, i hear you asking it and it sounds great. > though you do take a breath. > > avri > > On 11 Nov 2013, at 10:43, Maria Farrell wrote: > > > Avri hits all the topics I really hoped to see. I'd just add something > along the lines of - given the difficulties NCSG has had having any > positive impact on the policy process, and the findings in the Interconnect > ATRT2 report that significant numbers of ppl in the GNSO have no faith in > the process given the tendency of business interests to do end-runs around > it, how can ICANN be leading the charge for the multistakeholder process > externally? Shouldn't we get our own house in order first? > > > > And good luck to anyone who tries asking that 'question' in one breath... > > > > Maria > > > > > > On 10 November 2013 17:37, Avri Doria <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > > > > On 8 Nov 2013, at 20:27, Robin Gross wrote: > > > > > All, > > > > > > I'm preparing agenda items for our various discussions at the upcoming > ICANN Meeting #48 in Buenos Aires. > > > > > > So please let me know what agenda items you would like to speak to the > ICANN Board of Directors about during our 1 hour meeting with them in BA. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Robin > > > > > > Some possible questions: > > > > Q - details on the decisions they have made with regard to the NCSG case > on TMCH+50 and the DIDP request > > > > Q - general question on why they don't realize how bad their policies > and actions with regad to reconsideration etc are and why they don't do > anything about to fix it. > > > > Q - what are they going to do with 100's of millions they are going to > rake in from auctions. Will the community be involved in deciding on what > Why not? > > > > Q - why haven't we, the community, been included in these original plans > for Brazil, with a follow-up on implications arising from 11 Nov > anouncemtent on the BrazilThngy (assuming the announcement came out) > > > > avri > > > > > >