Hi, On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 8:05 AM, Amr Elsadr <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > Hi, > > I’ve taken a stab at drafting a comment on the ICANN Whois Privacy & Proxy > Abuse Study. The public comment period is over, but we have until November > 13th to submit a statement during the reply period. At this point, I would > like to know if members of the NCSG as well as the policy committee are > willing to endorse this statement, and whether or not there are any > suggested changes anyone feels need to be made. > > I’ve drafted the statement on a Google doc, which you can find here: > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1RS5Ze_0TU4ymdq0N8tROKrr2Vg-SpBp5ZEXTLUr7j84/edit?usp=sharing Instead of "Whois privacy and proxy service abuse should be conducted" I think you need to add the word "research" so it becomes: "Whois privacy and proxy service abuse research should be conducted" Then it is fine by me. -- Cheers, McTim "A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A route indicates how we get there." Jon Postel