Thanks McTim, I’ve replaced “more study of Whois privacy and proxy abuse should be conducted” with “more Whois privacy and proxy abuse research should be conducted” in the last paragraph. I hope that’s what you were referring to. Thanks again. Amr On Nov 11, 2013, at 1:27 PM, McTim <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 8:05 AM, Amr Elsadr <[log in to unmask]> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I’ve taken a stab at drafting a comment on the ICANN Whois Privacy & Proxy >> Abuse Study. The public comment period is over, but we have until November >> 13th to submit a statement during the reply period. At this point, I would >> like to know if members of the NCSG as well as the policy committee are >> willing to endorse this statement, and whether or not there are any >> suggested changes anyone feels need to be made. >> >> I’ve drafted the statement on a Google doc, which you can find here: >> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1RS5Ze_0TU4ymdq0N8tROKrr2Vg-SpBp5ZEXTLUr7j84/edit?usp=sharing > > > > Instead of "Whois privacy and proxy service abuse should be conducted" > > I think you need to add the word "research" so it becomes: > > "Whois privacy and proxy service abuse research should be conducted" > > > Then it is fine by me. > > -- > Cheers, > > McTim > "A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A > route indicates how we get there." Jon Postel