Hi, I dont even think there are preliminary agenda makers yet. i think they are still at a meta stage trying to figure out who the preliminary agenda makers should be. avri On 5 Nov 2013, at 18:25, Jorge Amodio wrote: > > Did you look under the table ? :-) > > Is there a proposed preliminary agenda anywhere ? > > -J > > > On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 5:25 PM, McTim <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > Hi Jorge, > > If I read the transcript of the call with GNSO Councillors correctly, > surveillance is not on the table. > > rgds, > > McTim > > On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 12:03 PM, Jorge Amodio <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > > > > I guess the summit in Rio will include a discussion about this no ? > > > > http://www.theverge.com/2013/11/5/5068024/brazil-admits-to-spying-on-us-russia-iran-diplomatic-targets-after-nsa-criticism > > > > -J > > > > > > > > -- > Cheers, > > McTim > "A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A > route indicates how we get there." Jon Postel >