Hi,

I dont even think there are preliminary agenda makers yet.
i think they are still at a meta stage trying to figure out who the preliminary agenda makers should be.

avri


On 5 Nov 2013, at 18:25, Jorge Amodio wrote:

> 
> Did you look under the table ? :-)
> 
> Is there a proposed preliminary agenda anywhere ?
> 
> -J
> 
> 
> On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 5:25 PM, McTim <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Hi Jorge,
> 
> If I read the transcript of the call with GNSO Councillors correctly,
> surveillance is not on the table.
> 
> rgds,
> 
> McTim
> 
> On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 12:03 PM, Jorge Amodio <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> >
> > I guess the summit in Rio will include a discussion about this no ?
> >
> > http://www.theverge.com/2013/11/5/5068024/brazil-admits-to-spying-on-us-russia-iran-diplomatic-targets-after-nsa-criticism
> >
> > -J
> >
> >
> 
> 
> 
> --
> Cheers,
> 
> McTim
> "A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A
> route indicates how we get there."  Jon Postel
>