They reinforced the importance of globally coherent Internet operations, and warned against Internet fragmentation at a national level. They expressed strong concern over the undermining of the trust and confidence of Internet users globally due to recent revelations of pervasive monitoring and surveillance.
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 9:30 PM, Avri Doria <[log in to unmask]> wrote:true, but in the recent call with Fadi and GNSO, Fadi said:
> Hi,
>
> I dont even think there are preliminary agenda makers yet.
> i think they are still at a meta stage trying to figure out who the preliminary agenda makers should be.
"So for example, some people are saying, "Oh, this will be all about
surveillance." It won't be. And I already told them that if we even
come close to the surveillance issue, we will pull out immediately,
all of us. This is not about surveillance. This is not a conference
that should come out with proposals to solve any particular problems.
This is a conference that should focus on high-level principles and,
as you said, these have been floating a lot of us, a lot of you have
done a lot of work on this that's just putting things together for
that, and should focus on an institutional framework."
--
Cheers,
McTim
"A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A
route indicates how we get there." Jon Postel