Hi, This statement has changed substantially over the past 24 hours with what I believe to be a lot of great input from different NCSGers. There is roughly just a little over 12 hours left before the deadline to submit, so this is a last call to take a look at the statement if you can. The statement can be found here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1RS5Ze_0TU4ymdq0N8tROKrr2Vg-SpBp5ZEXTLUr7j84/edit and more on the study can be found here: https://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/whois-pp-abuse-study-24sep13-en.htm Thanks all. Amr On Nov 12, 2013, at 10:49 PM, Amr Elsadr <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > Thanks for looking over it, Milton. I initially didn’t open editing rights to keep track of changes, but have changed that so that anyone can edit it now. I will insert some responses to your comments, and if you have the time to look over them and give more feedback, I’d really appreciate it. > > Thanks again. > > Amr > > On Nov 12, 2013, at 10:32 PM, Milton L Mueller <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > >> Amr: >> >> I have looked over the comments and would make some suggestions. I would edit it directly but I am not authorized on this doc so I have inserted some comments >> >> ________________________________________ >> From: NCSG-Discuss [[log in to unmask]] on behalf of Amr Elsadr [[log in to unmask]] >> Sent: Monday, November 11, 2013 8:01 AM >> To: [log in to unmask] >> Subject: Re: [NCSG-Discuss] NCSG Comment on ICANN's Whois Privacy & Proxy Abuse Study >> >> Thanks McTim, >> >> I’ve replaced “more study of Whois privacy and proxy abuse should be conducted” with “more Whois privacy and proxy abuse research should be conducted” in the last paragraph. I hope that’s what you were referring to. >> >> Thanks again. >> >> Amr >> >> On Nov 11, 2013, at 1:27 PM, McTim <[log in to unmask]> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 8:05 AM, Amr Elsadr <[log in to unmask]> wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I’ve taken a stab at drafting a comment on the ICANN Whois Privacy & Proxy >>>> Abuse Study. The public comment period is over, but we have until November >>>> 13th to submit a statement during the reply period. At this point, I would >>>> like to know if members of the NCSG as well as the policy committee are >>>> willing to endorse this statement, and whether or not there are any >>>> suggested changes anyone feels need to be made. >>>> >>>> I’ve drafted the statement on a Google doc, which you can find here: >>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1RS5Ze_0TU4ymdq0N8tROKrr2Vg-SpBp5ZEXTLUr7j84/edit?usp=sharing >>> >>> >>> >>> Instead of "Whois privacy and proxy service abuse should be conducted" >>> >>> I think you need to add the word "research" so it becomes: >>> >>> "Whois privacy and proxy service abuse research should be conducted" >>> >>> >>> Then it is fine by me. >>> >>> -- >>> Cheers, >>> >>> McTim >>> "A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A >>> route indicates how we get there." Jon Postel