HI, I would be interested in hearing the Boardīs views on the risks that the post-Montevideo/Bali process entails for ICANN. Sort of a quick informal risks assessment exercise...I would be curious to hear whether they have given some thoughts to it or they just react/act/support the CEO without foreseeing potential problems... Best, Marie-laure On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 10:31 AM, Maria Farrell <[log in to unmask]>wrote: > RIghto! > > > On 11 November 2013 16:22, Avri Doria <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> In my minds ear, i hear you asking it and it sounds great. >> though you do take a breath. >> >> avri >> >> On 11 Nov 2013, at 10:43, Maria Farrell wrote: >> >> > Avri hits all the topics I really hoped to see. I'd just add something >> along the lines of - given the difficulties NCSG has had having any >> positive impact on the policy process, and the findings in the Interconnect >> ATRT2 report that significant numbers of ppl in the GNSO have no faith in >> the process given the tendency of business interests to do end-runs around >> it, how can ICANN be leading the charge for the multistakeholder process >> externally? Shouldn't we get our own house in order first? >> > >> > And good luck to anyone who tries asking that 'question' in one >> breath... >> > >> > Maria >> > >> > >> > On 10 November 2013 17:37, Avri Doria <[log in to unmask]> wrote: >> > >> > On 8 Nov 2013, at 20:27, Robin Gross wrote: >> > >> > > All, >> > > >> > > I'm preparing agenda items for our various discussions at the >> upcoming ICANN Meeting #48 in Buenos Aires. >> > > >> > > So please let me know what agenda items you would like to speak to >> the ICANN Board of Directors about during our 1 hour meeting with them in >> BA. >> > > >> > > Thanks, >> > > Robin >> > >> > >> > Some possible questions: >> > >> > Q - details on the decisions they have made with regard to the NCSG >> case on TMCH+50 and the DIDP request >> > >> > Q - general question on why they don't realize how bad their policies >> and actions with regad to reconsideration etc are and why they don't do >> anything about to fix it. >> > >> > Q - what are they going to do with 100's of millions they are going to >> rake in from auctions. Will the community be involved in deciding on what >> Why not? >> > >> > Q - why haven't we, the community, been included in these original >> plans for Brazil, with a follow-up on implications arising from 11 Nov >> anouncemtent on the BrazilThngy (assuming the announcement came out) >> > >> > avri >> > >> > >> >> >