Hello,

Indeed a question about globalisation of IANA functions would be interesting. During the call that we had with Fadi about the Montevideo statement, I remember Christine Rosette expressing her concerns about this and asking Fadi if he could provide some clarification, to which he answered that this is nothing new and has been on the agenda for discussion for quite some time. Hearing the views of the board about the particular aspect could be another interesting input.

best,

mll

On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 10:18 AM, Avri Doria <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

Hi,

And personally I think globalization of IANA is the more important long range goal. IANA is the real throttle point for any of this stuff. ICANN is one of two main customers but not the only one. And if there ever is an advance in the number of naming authorities, one of my fonder pipe dreams, IANA would be the place the things come together are are served.

avri

On 14 Nov 2013, at 12:38, Kleinwächter, Wolfgang wrote:

> I support Carlos but would be more specific with the Montevideo statement. Globalization of ICANN and Globalization of IANA are two different shoes....
>
> wolfgang
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: NCSG-Discuss on behalf of Carlos A. Afonso
> Sent: Thu 11/14/2013 3:15 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: [NCSG-Discuss] Discussion Topics for NCSG with ICANN Board at ICANN #48 in Buenos Aires?
>
> Hmmm... this is so obvious but I will suggest anyway: how do they see
> the Montevideo Statement and the ensuing Brazil meeting?
>
> --c.a.
>
> On 11/08/2013 11:27 PM, Robin Gross wrote:
>> All,
>>
>> I'm preparing agenda items for our various discussions at the upcoming ICANN Meeting #48 in Buenos Aires.
>>
>> So please let me know what agenda items you would like to speak to the ICANN Board of Directors about during our 1 hour meeting with them in BA.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Robin
>>
>