Hi, I would like to also lend my support to this statement, and hope it can be endorsed by the NCSG. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1tuWn6tnQBFhXKz6FumabAHpG3zfCNx2ZBPzWNw3Ifo4/edit?usp=sharing Thanks. Amr On Feb 27, 2014, at 9:00 PM, Milton L Mueller <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > It seems that there were several expressions of support for this statement. I have made a few minor modifications based on suggestions from comments. Should I submit this statement on my own behalf only? Can I claim that it has support from the NCSG? Or can NCSG move forward with it on its own, and submit its own version separately? > > From: NCSG-Discuss [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Milton L Mueller > Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2014 5:18 PM > To: [log in to unmask] > Subject: [NCSG-Discuss] Submission to the Brazil meeting > > Dear fellow NCSG members: > > I am involved in preparing two submissions to the Brazil meeting. One, with Brenden Kuerbis, is a detailed proposal for globalization of IANA. It is not ready yet, but watch for it. > > The other is a proposed principle about stakeholder equality. That statement is ready for your viewing and comment here: > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1tuWn6tnQBFhXKz6FumabAHpG3zfCNx2ZBPzWNw3Ifo4/edit?usp=sharing > > It’s a short 2-pager, 600 words. I just want to test the waters and see how much support there is for this or whether it needs major revisions. > > > Milton Mueller > Professor, Syracuse University School of Information Studies > http://faculty.ischool.syr.edu/mueller/