This is a good document, congratulations! On 23 March 2014 19:21, Heather Leson <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > Thank you. > > I've reviewed and look forward to the next steps. > > Heather > > Heather Leson > [log in to unmask] > Twitter: HeatherLeson > Blog: textontechs.com > > > On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 2:49 PM, Nicolas Adam <[log in to unmask]>wrote: > >> I am with McTim on this one. >> >> Nicolas >> >> >> On 2014-03-23 1:47 PM, McTim wrote: >> >>> It is a perfectly reasonable statement IMO. >>> >>> On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 12:44 PM, Rafik Dammak <[log in to unmask]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Hello everyone, >>>> >>>> just to clarify about this statement as NCSG comment on IANA transition: >>>> - we had the PC meeting today and discussed about the statement as was >>>> requested. we made some changes suggested during the meeting. >>>> - this version was circulated by Milton to the NCSG list with 24 hours >>>> for >>>> comments. >>>> - after that I will send it on behalf of NCSG to the concerned parties. >>>> hope that is much more clear. >>>> >>>> Best Regards, >>>> >>>> Rafik >>>> >>>> >>>> 2014-03-23 17:51 GMT+09:00 Milton L Mueller <[log in to unmask]>: >>>> >>>>> Visible here: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1sJ0Fo_ >>>>> 4LalYbyRuq4B3X5uf7TySIDq9Mrb3UVByoXIg/edit?usp=sharing >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >