I am with McTim on this one. Nicolas On 2014-03-23 1:47 PM, McTim wrote: > It is a perfectly reasonable statement IMO. > > On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 12:44 PM, Rafik Dammak <[log in to unmask]> wrote: >> Hello everyone, >> >> just to clarify about this statement as NCSG comment on IANA transition: >> - we had the PC meeting today and discussed about the statement as was >> requested. we made some changes suggested during the meeting. >> - this version was circulated by Milton to the NCSG list with 24 hours for >> comments. >> - after that I will send it on behalf of NCSG to the concerned parties. >> hope that is much more clear. >> >> Best Regards, >> >> Rafik >> >> >> 2014-03-23 17:51 GMT+09:00 Milton L Mueller <[log in to unmask]>: >>> Visible here: >>> >>> >>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1sJ0Fo_4LalYbyRuq4B3X5uf7TySIDq9Mrb3UVByoXIg/edit?usp=sharing >> > >