Hi Avri, Thank you very much. It seems that the most substantial proposals, in any direction, are in document B (no consensus). Could you clarify what the next steps of the WGEC are? Thanks! Marilia On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 4:38 PM, Avri Doria <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > > Sorry about the forward as opposed to putting them on line somewhere. > > > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: Documents pertaining to the third meeting of the WGEC as > of at > the time when the meeting concluded. > Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2014 18:10:09 +0100 > From: WGEC <[log in to unmask]> > Reply-To: Correspondence Group of the WGEC <[log in to unmask]> > To: [log in to unmask] > > > > Dear WGEC and CG Members, > > Please find attached the documents pertaining to the third meeting of > the WGEC as of at the time when the meeting concluded. > > Doc 1: Contains the recommendations that were agreed and those that will > be revisited in the fourth meeting of the WGEC. > > Doc 2: Contains the recommendations which did not enjoy consensus in the > meeting. > > Doc 3: Contains the recommendations under categories D and E that were > not discussed in the meeting. > > > Best regards > > CSTD Secretariat > > > > -- *Marília Maciel* Pesquisadora Gestora Centro de Tecnologia e Sociedade - FGV Direito Rio Researcher and Coordinator Center for Technology & Society - FGV Law School http://direitorio.fgv.br/cts DiploFoundation associate www.diplomacy.edu