HI BK, Is a purely intergov soultion then in scope for IGP? for the EC? just curious On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 11:20 AM, Brenden Kuerbis <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > In case you missed it, or simply haven't had time to keep up with transition > of the IANA functions debate, we have a new article on how ICANN has > attempted to preempt discussion of options by issuing a narrow Scoping > Document: > > http://www.internetgovernance.org/2014/04/16/icann-anything-that-doesnt-give-iana-to-me-is-out-of-scope/ > > The IGP thinks this is wrong. Yesterday, the European Commission agreed > with that, saying "there should be no artificial limitation in the scope of > the discussion." > > Toward the end of the article, we provide a link for a redlined version of > the document, which revises the scope according to the NTIA's announcement: > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1nYQwmfTB52fLwT88RpAyGd3kD69rBLXbnG5zi5IT9yw/edit > > We invite your comments or suggestions. > > Thanks! > > > > --------------------------------------- > Brenden Kuerbis > Internet Governance Project > http://internetgovernance.org -- Cheers, McTim "A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A route indicates how we get there." Jon Postel