Thanks Like I mentioned here a little while back: while I used to have a very busy RSS feed roll and I would follow closely many things Icann-related and a great many number of related subjects, I nowadays only have time for what you here suggest. So ... thank you for sharing Brendon. Nicolas On 17/04/2014 12:20 PM, Brenden Kuerbis wrote: > In case you missed it, or simply haven't had time to keep up with > transition of the IANA functions debate, we have a new article on how > ICANN has attempted to preempt discussion of options by issuing a > narrow Scoping Document: > > http://www.internetgovernance.org/2014/04/16/icann-anything-that-doesnt-give-iana-to-me-is-out-of-scope/ > > The IGP thinks this is wrong. Yesterday, the European Commission > agreed with that, saying "there should be no artificial limitation in > the scope of the discussion." > > Toward the end of the article, we provide a link for a redlined > version of the document, which revises the scope according to the > NTIA's announcement: > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1nYQwmfTB52fLwT88RpAyGd3kD69rBLXbnG5zi5IT9yw/edit > > We invite your comments or suggestions. > > Thanks! > > > > --------------------------------------- > Brenden Kuerbis > Internet Governance Project > http://internetgovernance.org