On April 9, 2014 11:01:19 PM Amr Elsadr <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > Thanks McTim, > > Substantively, I agree with you and I sympathise with the registries > that have .brand applications. On the other hand, I am concerned with >gTLD > policy being developed by the ICANN board purely from a >process perspective. I would argue on that point out of principle. The >idea of the ICANN board developing policy is not one that I relish. IIRC, the application guidebook provides the applicants an avenue for requesting for exemptions from some of the specifications. Specification 13 looks like an embodiment of an exemption sought by a specific group. So this isn't really developing a new policy. Like McTim I find it very strange why .Brands would need to use registrars at all. Another is why they would need to escrow their data. After all, a closed brand's registrants are all units of the brand. If the registry fails, it is the brand which suffers, not an innocent 3rd party which needs protection from ICANN Sent with AquaMail for Android http://www.aqua-mail.com