Hi Rafik & Brenden, Do we have a drafting team for this? Cheers, Niels On 04/21/2014 08:08 PM, Rafik Dammak wrote: > Hi Brenden, > > Thanks for sharing this, we have as NCSG to respond to the comment > regarding the draft proposal from ICANN too (the scoping document is > part of it). > > Best Regards, > > Rafik > > > 2014-04-18 1:20 GMT+09:00 Brenden Kuerbis > <[log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>>: > > In case you missed it, or simply haven't had time to keep up with > transition of the IANA functions debate, we have a new article on > how ICANN has attempted to preempt discussion of options by issuing > a narrow Scoping Document: > > http://www.internetgovernance.org/2014/04/16/icann-anything-that-doesnt-give-iana-to-me-is-out-of-scope/ > > The IGP thinks this is wrong. Yesterday, the European Commission > agreed with that, saying "there should be no artificial limitation > in the scope of the discussion." > > Toward the end of the article, we provide a link for a redlined > version of the document, which revises the scope according to the > NTIA's announcement: > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1nYQwmfTB52fLwT88RpAyGd3kD69rBLXbnG5zi5IT9yw/edit > > We invite your comments or suggestions. > > Thanks! > > > > --------------------------------------- > Brenden Kuerbis > Internet Governance Project > http://internetgovernance.org > >