I agree to IAB suggestion on handling the 3 areas of the transition separately and by their relevant interest group's community. It will improve on the quality/relevance of input and allow for overall transparency we all desire in the process. Thanks sent from Google nexus 4 kindly excuse brevity and typos. On 30 Apr 2014 15:24, "Rafik Dammak" <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > Hi, > > IAB comments on the IANA process proposal. > > Rafik > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: IAB Chair <[log in to unmask]> > Date: 2014-04-30 6:49 GMT+09:00 > Subject: [Internetgovtech] IAB Sends Comments to ICANN on the Transition > NTIA’s Stewardship of the IANA Functions > To: IETF Announce <[log in to unmask]> > Cc: [log in to unmask], IAB <[log in to unmask]>, IETF <[log in to unmask]>, > [log in to unmask] > > > Today, the IAB sent comments regarding the “Draft Proposal, Based on > Initial Community Feedback, of the Principles and Mechanisms and the > Process to Develop a Proposal to Transition NTIA’s Stewardship of the IANA > Functions”. The comments are on the IAB web site: > > http://www.iab.org/wp-content/IAB-uploads/2014/04/iab-response-to-20140408-20140428a.pdf > > Thanks for your consideration, > Russ Housley > IAB Chair > _______________________________________________ > Internetgovtech mailing list > [log in to unmask] > https://www.iab.org/mailman/listinfo/internetgovtech > >