I agree to IAB suggestion on handling the 3 areas of the transition separately and by their relevant interest group's community. It will improve on the quality/relevance of input and allow for overall transparency we all desire in the process.
Thanks
sent from Google nexus 4
kindly excuse brevity and typos.
Hi,IAB comments on the IANA process proposal.
Rafik---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: IAB Chair <[log in to unmask]>
Date: 2014-04-30 6:49 GMT+09:00
Subject: [Internetgovtech] IAB Sends Comments to ICANN on the Transition NTIA’s Stewardship of the IANA Functions
To: IETF Announce <[log in to unmask]>
Cc: [log in to unmask], IAB <[log in to unmask]>, IETF <[log in to unmask]>, [log in to unmask]
Today, the IAB sent comments regarding the “Draft Proposal, Based on Initial Community Feedback, of the Principles and Mechanisms and the Process to Develop a Proposal to Transition NTIA’s Stewardship of the IANA Functions”. The comments are on the IAB web site:
http://www.iab.org/wp-content/IAB-uploads/2014/04/iab-response-to-20140408-20140428a.pdf
Thanks for your consideration,
Russ Housley
IAB Chair
_______________________________________________
Internetgovtech mailing list
[log in to unmask]
https://www.iab.org/mailman/listinfo/internetgovtech