I do not support this notion at all. On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 9:27 AM, avri doria <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > > What do people think? > > Is this a PDP we support? > > And are members willing to volunteer for the WGs and the comments? > > avri > > Sent from a T-Mobile 4G LTE Device > > > -------- Original message -------- > From: Mary Wong > Date:05/25/2014 10:16 (GMT-05:00) > To: [log in to unmask] > Subject: [council] Final Issue Report on IGO & INGO Access to Curative > Rights Protection Mechanisms > > Dear all, > > Please find attached for your consideration the Final Issue Report on > amending the UDRP and URS to enable IGO and INGO access to curative rights > protection mechanisms. You will recall that the Council requested an Issue > Report on the topic at the Buenos Aires meeting in November 2013 when it > adopted the consensus recommendations from the PDP WG on Protection of > International Organization Identifiers in All gTLDs (IGO-INGO PDP WG). Under > the ICANN Bylaws, an Issue Report is a mandatory preceding step to a > possible PDP that is initiated by the GNSO Council. The Preliminary Issue > Report was published for public comment on 10 March 2014, with the reply > period of the forum closing on 6 May 2014. A Report of Public Comments > received was published on 16 May 2014. > > In preparing this Final Issue Report, all the public comments received were > analyzed and, where relevant, incorporated into the Final Issue Report. The > Report of Public Comments has also been added as a separate Annex. > > Essentially, the staff recommendation is that the Council initiate a PDP to > consider: (1) whether the UDPR and/or URS should be amended for IGO and INGO > access and use; and (2) if so, in what way or whether a separate, narrowly > tailored procedure modeled on these measures, to apply specifically only to > IGOs and INGOs, should be developed. Staff also recommends that the PDP be > limited to considering only those IGO and INGO identifiers that the original > IGO-INGO PDP WG recommended for protection, and the Final Issue Report > outlines a number of specific issues and additional considerations for the > Council to review in determining the scope and work of the PDP. > > The relevant motions are currently in preparation for proposal by a GNSO > Councilor. > > The public comment forum, including a link to the Report of Public Comments, > the Preliminary Issue Report and the Final Report of the IGO-INGO PDP WG can > be found here: > https://www.icann.org/public-comments/igo-ingo-crp-prelim-2014-03-10-en. > > Thanks and cheers > Mary > > Mary Wong > Senior Policy Director > Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN) > Telephone: +1 603 574 4892 > Email: [log in to unmask] > > * One World. One Internet. * -- Cheers, McTim "A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A route indicates how we get there." Jon Postel