Hi Avri, indeed the reply period should be used to continue the work on the comments and reading other contributions. that period goes till the London meeting and I expect we will have deep conversation there. I also think we should have a group of volunteers to keep working on the two tracks for the coming months. On other hand,I found that 2 other NCSG members submitted their comments in addition to robin and yours: Center for Internet and Society http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-enhancing-accountability-06may14/msg00038.html DeeDee Halleck http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-enhancing-accountability-06may14/msg00000.html Best, Rafik 2014-06-07 15:38 GMT+09:00 Avri Doria <[log in to unmask]>: > Hi, > > Good comments. One of the best I've read yet. > > BTW, i think this topic is important enough that we should consider > doing a response after we have had a chance to read the comments of others. > > would also give us a chance to reinforce some of the salient points made > in our various comments. > > avri > > > > On 07-Jun-14 01:19, Robin Gross wrote: > > Attached are my personal comments submitted today on Enhancing ICANN > > Accountability. > > > > Thanks, > > Robin > > > > > > > > > > Begin forwarded message: > > > >> *From: *Robin Gross <[log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask] > >> > >> *Subject: **Protection for Human Rights, Independent Checks, Greater > >> Transparency, Adherence to Bottom-Up Decision Making* > >> *Date: *June 6, 2014 3:34:23 PM PDT > >> *To: *[log in to unmask] > >> <mailto:[log in to unmask]> > >> > >> Attached please find my individual comments on Enhancing ICANN > >> Accountability. > >> > >> Thank you, > >> Robin Gross > >> > >> > > >