On a lighter note, perhaps it's good to read from Milton on whether he accepts the nomination especially considering the requirement listed by Maria. Cheers! sent from Google nexus 4 kindly excuse brevity and typos. On 25 Jun 2014 10:31, "Maria Farrell" <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > Hi all, > > Thanks for this nomination, and to Avri for posting this on the discuss > list. > > Here are the criteria we agreed to apply to this selection: > > Knowledge of Internet governance substantive issues, processes, players - > and political 'nous' to understand agendas > Knowledge of how IANA actually works > Time to commit to it - process likely to be time-consuming > Commitment to pro-actively feed back to the NCSG and transmit our views > back to the transition coordination group > Commitment to help communicating to broader groups in our community > > All the best, > > Maria > > > On 25 June 2014 10:12, William Drake <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > >> +1 to our ethos embodier >> >> On Jun 25, 2014, at 9:36 AM, Avri Doria <[log in to unmask]> wrote: >> >> > Hi, >> > >> > This is being discussed on the NCSG Policy list, but I think it ought to >> > also be discussed here. >> > >> > I have nominated Milton, my long time argument foil (we disagree as much >> > as we agree) - and friend for the role on the IANA Transition >> > Coordination group. >> > >> > I cannot think of anyone else who >> > >> > - better understands the issue >> > - better understands the needs of the NCSG >> > - who has greater influence in this area >> > - or who has been more dedicated for as long to non commercial causes at >> > ICANN >> > >> > I hope he gets the support of our membership so that the PC feels able >> > to pick him for the role. >> > >> > avri >> > >