Thank you Edward for putting together such a constructive comment. This is a great beginning for the details that must follow (as you carefully noted where additional policy/bylaw specifics are required). Is it worth asking the leaders of other constituencies if they would support all (or any) of these recommendations? If agreement from bottom-up consensus of what needs to be done were presented to the board it would be even more powerful than this well-reasoned comment. And I want to add that after Avri's recognition and reading this type of criticism/suggestion proposal has renewed a feeling of optimism regarding the future of ICANN/IANA. I hope others inside and outside NCSG agree on the direction that Edward's summary of worthwile options point in a more beneficial direction the now giant ship of ICANN. -ron On Sun, 29 Jun 2014, David Cake wrote: > Let me add my voice to the chorus congratulating you on a well written and thorough contribution. > > I think it will be a very valuable addition to ongoing accountability discussion. > > Regards > > David > > On 28 Jun 2014, at 1:33 am, Edward Morris <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > > <ENHANCING ICANN ACCOUNTABILITY.docx> > >