Hi Avri,

Thank you very much the update and action taken in regard to the discussion
held during the NCSG monthly call
we can review the charter and work on requesting amendments.

Best,

Rafik


2014-06-06 6:08 GMT+09:00 Avri Doria <[log in to unmask]>:

> Hi,
>
> While the PDP was approved unanimously, we delayed the vote on the charter.
>
> Why.
>
> In discussing the PDP itself: it discusses the possible extension of the
> UDRP and URS to support IGOs and IGNOs, but also allows for either the
> creation of a new process if it would be best to leave those alone, or
> for no mechanism at all.  So, as requested by the previous WG and
> approved by both the last council and the Board, and now this council,
> we will have a PDP on the issue of extending the UDRP and URS, but with
> no obligation to do so.  And I would say that the GNSO is not of one
> mind on the hoped for outcome.  NCSG is not alone in its doubts, but we
> do need to tackle the subject.
>
> I requested the delay on the charter vote, using the 'the SG needs more
> discussion' reason.  I also made it clear that I had not been able to
> properly explain the issue to the SG. I got no trouble for that, in fact
> people from several SG supported the call for a delay.
>
> I think we need to review the charter carefully as that is where the top
> of all the slippery slopes is to be found.  We can offer amendments to
> the charter if we have any.
>
> avri
>