Hi, And since Stephanie's comment was not accepted as part of the report, we should submit it as a comment with a strong rebuke to the EWG for not having allowed it to be attached. This in addition to any other comments and it should be submitted on day 1 of the comment period - as close to being part of the report as possible. avri On 07-Jun-14 10:21, Rafik Dammak wrote: > Hi Stephanie, > > thank you for all efforts and I acknowledge the difficulty to > participate in the EWG where it is not easy to defend privacy > unfortunately. your participation probably helped to prevent more worse > outcome. > > we need to respond to the report and so volunteers to do so( we have > also to respond to the Whois and local laws too!) > we have many things to discuss in London in this regard. > can you please share your dissenting report if possible? > > Best, > > Rafik > > 2014-06-07 10:13 GMT+09:00 Stephanie Perrin > <[log in to unmask] > <mailto:[log in to unmask]>>: > > The EWG report is out. I wrote a dissenting report, but they would > not publish it. I will give a prize to the persons who find what I > am complaining about (Tamir, Milton, and Kathy, you don't count!) > Thanks to all who have helped and encouraged me during this long and > lonely year. > Stephanie > > > -------- Original Message -------- > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear All,____ > > __ __ > > I am very pleased to inform you that the EWG Final Report is now > posted- see: > https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/final-report-06jun14-en.pdf. > ____ > > __ __ > > It will appear shortly on the ICANN homepage and will be part of a > blog on Monday.____ > > __ __ > > > > _______________________________________________ > Ncuc-discuss mailing list > [log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]> > http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss > >