I attached it to the email I sent. I don't think it has a url home yet. when it gets one i will let the list know. as for including you, not up to me. at this point it is up to NCSG to discuss and come up with suggestions for amendments. I have no idea whether or if anyone is going to do so. I was not planning to lead such an effort, but will follow it. BTW, I expect the volunteer call for the WG to go out soon. Be sure to volunteer if you care. I don't plan to as I am already overextending. As for the other KK, i don't not understand why he dropped out, but anyone is free to pass it on to him. avri On 06-Jun-14 16:08, Kathy Kleiman wrote: > Avri, > Could you please send a link around to the draft charter and include me > in any calls scheduled to discuss? I also think we should cc > Konstantinos as another person in our midst who has spent many years on > the UDRP. > Tx, > Kathy : >> Hi Avri, >> >> Thank you very much the update and action taken in regard to the >> discussion held during the NCSG monthly call >> we can review the charter and work on requesting amendments. >> >> Best, >> >> Rafik >> >> >> 2014-06-06 6:08 GMT+09:00 Avri Doria <[log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>>: >> >> Hi, >> >> While the PDP was approved unanimously, we delayed the vote on the >> charter. >> >> Why. >> >> In discussing the PDP itself: it discusses the possible extension >> of the >> UDRP and URS to support IGOs and IGNOs, but also allows for either the >> creation of a new process if it would be best to leave those alone, or >> for no mechanism at all. So, as requested by the previous WG and >> approved by both the last council and the Board, and now this council, >> we will have a PDP on the issue of extending the UDRP and URS, but >> with >> no obligation to do so. And I would say that the GNSO is not of one >> mind on the hoped for outcome. NCSG is not alone in its doubts, >> but we >> do need to tackle the subject. >> >> I requested the delay on the charter vote, using the 'the SG needs >> more >> discussion' reason. I also made it clear that I had not been able to >> properly explain the issue to the SG. I got no trouble for that, >> in fact >> people from several SG supported the call for a delay. >> >> I think we need to review the charter carefully as that is where >> the top >> of all the slippery slopes is to be found. We can offer amendments to >> the charter if we have any. >> >> avri >> >> >