Hi Avri,

indeed the reply period should be used to continue the work on the comments and reading other contributions. that period goes till the London meeting and I expect we will have deep conversation there.

I also think we should have a group of volunteers to keep working on the two tracks for the coming months.

On other hand,I found that 2 other NCSG members submitted their comments in addition to robin and yours:

Center for Internet and Society http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-enhancing-accountability-06may14/msg00038.html

DeeDee Halleck http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-enhancing-accountability-06may14/msg00000.html

Best,

Rafik

2014-06-07 15:38 GMT+09:00 Avri Doria <[log in to unmask]>:

Hi,

Good comments. One of the best I've read yet.

BTW, i think this topic is important enough that we should consider
doing a response after we have had a chance to read the comments of others.

would also give us a chance to reinforce some of the salient points made
in our various comments.

avri

On 07-Jun-14 01:19, Robin Gross wrote:
> Attached are my personal comments submitted today on Enhancing ICANN
> Accountability.
>
> Thanks,
> Robin
>
>
>
>

> Begin forwarded message:
>
>> *From: *Robin Gross <[log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>>
>> *Subject: **Protection for Human Rights, Independent Checks, Greater
>> Transparency, Adherence to Bottom-Up Decision Making*
>> *Date: *June 6, 2014 3:34:23 PM PDT
>> *To: *[log in to unmask]
>> <mailto:[log in to unmask]>
>>
>> Attached please find my individual comments on Enhancing ICANN
>> Accountability.
>>
>> Thank you,
>> Robin Gross
>>
>>
>