Hi Bill,we cannot ask for change the first page as I was told by GNSO secretariat and for the second as I told you I have the permissions to edit it .Rafik2014-06-07 19:42 GMT+09:00 William Drake <[log in to unmask]>:Hi RafikI meant the link on the schedule page http://london50.icann.org/en/schedule/tue-ncsg that goes to our Confluence page https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/NCSG+London+Meeting+2014-06-24cheersBDOn Jun 7, 2014, at 10:45 AM, Rafik Dammak <[log in to unmask]> wrote:Hi Bill,The paper (and any other inputs members devise) can of course be used as a backgrounder to our privacy session, and we could ask staff change the Confluence link to say Workshop Agenda and Background Paper(s) so it’s widely accessible anyway.we don't need staff support for this, I have the permissions to edit in that page. it should be populated soon.RafikOn Jun 7, 2014, at 10:21 AM, Rafik Dammak <[log in to unmask]> wrote:Hi Stephanie,thank you for all efforts and I acknowledge the difficulty to participate in the EWG where it is not easy to defend privacy unfortunately. your participation probably helped to prevent more worse outcome.we need to respond to the report and so volunteers to do so( we have also to respond to the Whois and local laws too!)we have many things to discuss in London in this regard.can you please share your dissenting report if possible?Best,Rafik2014-06-07 10:13 GMT+09:00 Stephanie Perrin <[log in to unmask]>:
The EWG report is out. I wrote a dissenting report, but they would not publish it. I will give a prize to the persons who find what I am complaining about (Tamir, Milton, and Kathy, you don't count!)
Thanks to all who have helped and encouraged me during this long and lonely year.
Stephanie
-------- Original Message --------
Dear All,
I am very pleased to inform you that the EWG Final Report is now posted- see: https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/final-report-06jun14-en.pdf.
It will appear shortly on the ICANN homepage and will be part of a blog on Monday.