Shouldn't we do a more or less formal ballot? Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez +506 8335 2487 Enviado desde mi iPhone > El 26/06/2014, a las 08:13, William Drake <[log in to unmask]> escribió: > > Hi > >> On Jun 25, 2014, at 11:55 PM, Sonigitu Ekpe <[log in to unmask]> wrote: >> >> Sam has withdrawn, > > Which is a pity > >> yet to hear from Milton. > > I’m going to guess he’s interested >> >> I nominate William Drake as one with vibrancy to stand the criteria. > > Thanks for the thought but there is no way I can take on another labor intensive volunteer job at this time. >> >>> On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 11:46 PM, Lori Schulman <[log in to unmask]> wrote: >>> As to Avri’s point, I agree that this is about NCSG and not constituencies >>> > 100% agreement---as with the Council, we need to avoid viewing SG representation as an inter-constituency squabble over positional goods. At this level things should be shared, including the workload. >>> but it also should be about fairness and I didn’t even see the email that said we were running a ballot today. >>> > People were simply expressing support, it’s not a ballot. > > Best, > > Bill > >