Shouldn't we do a more or less formal ballot?

Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez
+506 8335 2487
Enviado desde mi iPhone

> El 26/06/2014, a las 08:13, William Drake <[log in to unmask]> escribió:
> 
> Hi
> 
>> On Jun 25, 2014, at 11:55 PM, Sonigitu Ekpe <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>> 
>> Sam has withdrawn,
> 
> Which is a pity
> 
>> yet to hear from Milton.
> 
> I’m going to guess he’s interested
>> 
>> I nominate William Drake as one with vibrancy to stand the criteria. 
> 
> Thanks for the thought but there is no way I can take on another labor intensive volunteer job at this time.
>> 
>>> On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 11:46 PM, Lori Schulman <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>>  As to Avri’s point, I agree that this is about NCSG and not constituencies
>>> 
> 100% agreement---as with the Council, we need to avoid viewing SG representation as an inter-constituency squabble over positional goods.  At this level things should be shared, including the workload.
>>> but it also should be about fairness and I didn’t even see the email that said we were running a ballot today.
>>> 
> People were simply expressing support, it’s not a ballot.
> 
> Best,
> 
> Bill
> 
>