Hi Carlos, If needed, yes, the NCSG Policy Committee will run a vote to decide. All the best, Maria On 26 June 2014 08:19, Carlos Raúl G. <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > Shouldn't we do a more or less formal ballot? > > Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez > +506 8335 2487 > Enviado desde mi iPhone > > El 26/06/2014, a las 08:13, William Drake <[log in to unmask]> escribió: > > Hi > > On Jun 25, 2014, at 11:55 PM, Sonigitu Ekpe <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > > > Sam has withdrawn, > > > Which is a pity > > yet to hear from Milton. > > > I’m going to guess he’s interested > > > I nominate William Drake as one with vibrancy to stand the criteria. > > > Thanks for the thought but there is no way I can take on another labor > intensive volunteer job at this time. > > > On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 11:46 PM, Lori Schulman <[log in to unmask]> > wrote: > >> As to Avri’s point, I agree that this is about NCSG and not >> constituencies >> > 100% agreement---as with the Council, we need to avoid viewing SG > representation as an inter-constituency squabble over positional goods. At > this level things should be shared, including the workload. > > but it also should be about fairness and I didn’t even see the email that >> said we were running a ballot today. >> > People were simply expressing support, it’s not a ballot. > > Best, > > Bill > > >