+1 On Sun, Jun 22, 2014 at 6:26 PM, Joana Varon <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > Interesting. During NetMundial, president Dilma made a similar point in > her opening speech: multilateral+multistakeholder. > > My take is that we would only solve this dilema trying to put things in > practice, as I feal that so far we dont have a proper mutistakeholder > process put in place with transparency and accountability. > > Best > > Joana > > ----- > Joana Varon Ferraz > @joana_varon > Researcher > Center for Technology and Society > Fundação Getulio Vargas > > > On Sunday, June 22, 2014, Sam Lanfranco <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > >> This is an example of the wording that the US Government is now using >> when talking about the future of Internet governance. It helps when >> thinking about the properties of a deliverable IANA transition proposal. >> Internet Governance: Multistakeholder, Multilateral Sectors Can Coexist >> *Internet Governance: Multistakeholder Consensus With Multilateral >> Affirmation**by Daniel Sepulveda** >> >> "One of the issues at the center of discussions over the future of >> Internet governance is how multilateral and multistakeholder institutions >> with an interest in working on Internet-related issues can coexist without >> duplication or conflict and without threatening to undermine the Internet >> and its promise. In an ideal world, each would learn from the other, and >> the activity of one would only add value to the other". >> >> Read more: >> http://iipdigital.usembassy.gov/st/english/article/2014/06/20140618301689.html#ixzz35O9PZiGR >> >> **Sepulveda serves as the U.S. deputy assistant secretary of state and >> coordinator for international communications and information policy in the >> Bureau of Economic and Business Affairs.* >> >> Sam Lanfranco >> > > > -- > Sent from Mobile > -- http://www.deepdishwavesofchange.org