On 13-Jul-14 23:54, Nicolas Adam wrote: > On the "scope of the work of the transition" I agree with Sam's wording: > it should be thought very widely as choosing and planning a new > institutional arrangement. All possible institutional arrangements are > possible candidates and the scope of the work of the transition should > positively not preclude any conceivable such arrangements. On this, I tend to look for the minimum change that can be made to achieve for continued operations and stability while achieving the necessary other conditions. I think it is important to keep as much of the existing institutional arrangements in place as possible, being sure to meet the necessary accountability and other requirements. avri