Ok, my confusion. The letter sent suggested to me that questions already existed. Impression I got was SO-AC had a been discussing substantive issues. About time SO/AC list had public archive. (Bill, thanks for your note/effort on this) Adam On Sunday, August 31, 2014, Rafik Dammak <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > Hi Adam, > > SO/AC "leadership" is not discussing any specific questions, since each > group is supposed to collect its inquiries. no group shared its questions > yet. > > Best, > > Rafik > > > 2014-08-31 17:15 GMT+09:00 Adam <[log in to unmask] > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml',[log in to unmask]);>>: > >> we are now 5 days into the 7 days for compiling then sending clarifying >> questions. >> >> What questions have the SO/AC leadership been discussing, could we see >> them. >> >> Thanks, >> >> Adam >> >> >> On Aug 31, 2014, at 2:02 PM, Rafik Dammak wrote: >> >> > Hi everyone, >> > >> > As indicated in the response from the ICANN CEO and the board (letter >> attached), they are willing to respond to questions and request for >> clarification for the accountability process proposal >> https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-4-2014-08-25-en >> > >> > While there was no decision made by NCSG policy regarding the >> joint-letter, I think it is worthy to take this opportunity and asking for >> clarifications. >> > so please send your questions to be compiled here >> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1X-gZLs35QL-TkJf6Rbyb9mlPS0oMfpi67ZEwXXZt_qA/edit >> > >> > We need to do this asap. >> > >> > As reminder there is also a "Townhall" session at IGF next Tuesday >> about ICANN accountability http://goo.gl/sTjkLM . >> > >> > Best, >> > >> > Rafik >> > >> > <2014-8-28-SO-AC-SG-leaders.pdf> >> > >