Hi, registries prepared their questions, not finalized yet (document attached) Rafik 2014-08-31 18:12 GMT+09:00 Adam Peake <[log in to unmask]>: > Ok, my confusion. The letter sent suggested to me that questions already > existed. Impression I got was SO-AC had a been discussing substantive > issues. > > About time SO/AC list had public archive. (Bill, thanks for your > note/effort on this) > > Adam > > > > On Sunday, August 31, 2014, Rafik Dammak <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > >> Hi Adam, >> >> SO/AC "leadership" is not discussing any specific questions, since each >> group is supposed to collect its inquiries. no group shared its questions >> yet. >> >> Best, >> >> Rafik >> >> >> 2014-08-31 17:15 GMT+09:00 Adam <[log in to unmask]>: >> >>> we are now 5 days into the 7 days for compiling then sending clarifying >>> questions. >>> >>> What questions have the SO/AC leadership been discussing, could we see >>> them. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Adam >>> >>> >>> On Aug 31, 2014, at 2:02 PM, Rafik Dammak wrote: >>> >>> > Hi everyone, >>> > >>> > As indicated in the response from the ICANN CEO and the board (letter >>> attached), they are willing to respond to questions and request for >>> clarification for the accountability process proposal >>> https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-4-2014-08-25-en >>> > >>> > While there was no decision made by NCSG policy regarding the >>> joint-letter, I think it is worthy to take this opportunity and asking for >>> clarifications. >>> > so please send your questions to be compiled here >>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1X-gZLs35QL-TkJf6Rbyb9mlPS0oMfpi67ZEwXXZt_qA/edit >>> > >>> > We need to do this asap. >>> > >>> > As reminder there is also a "Townhall" session at IGF next Tuesday >>> about ICANN accountability http://goo.gl/sTjkLM . >>> > >>> > Best, >>> > >>> > Rafik >>> > >>> > <2014-8-28-SO-AC-SG-leaders.pdf> >>> >> >>