Hi,

registries prepared their  questions, not finalized yet (document attached)

Rafik

2014-08-31 18:12 GMT+09:00 Adam Peake <[log in to unmask]>:

> Ok, my confusion. The letter sent suggested to me that questions already
> existed. Impression I got was SO-AC had a been discussing substantive
> issues.
>
> About time SO/AC list had public archive. (Bill, thanks for your
> note/effort on this)
>
> Adam
>
>
>
> On Sunday, August 31, 2014, Rafik Dammak <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
>> Hi Adam,
>>
>> SO/AC "leadership" is not discussing any specific questions, since each
>> group is supposed to collect its inquiries.  no group shared its questions
>> yet.
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Rafik
>>
>>
>> 2014-08-31 17:15 GMT+09:00 Adam <[log in to unmask]>:
>>
>>> we are now 5 days into the 7 days for compiling then sending clarifying
>>> questions.
>>>
>>> What questions have the SO/AC leadership been discussing, could we see
>>> them.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Adam
>>>
>>>
>>> On Aug 31, 2014, at 2:02 PM, Rafik Dammak wrote:
>>>
>>> > Hi everyone,
>>> >
>>> > As indicated in the response from the ICANN CEO and the board (letter
>>> attached), they are willing to respond to questions and request for
>>> clarification for the accountability process proposal
>>> https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-4-2014-08-25-en
>>> >
>>> > While there was no decision made by NCSG policy regarding the
>>> joint-letter, I think it is worthy to take this opportunity and asking for
>>> clarifications.
>>> > so please send your questions to be compiled here
>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1X-gZLs35QL-TkJf6Rbyb9mlPS0oMfpi67ZEwXXZt_qA/edit
>>> >
>>> > We need to do this asap.
>>> >
>>> > As reminder there is also a "Townhall" session at IGF next Tuesday
>>> about ICANN accountability http://goo.gl/sTjkLM .
>>> >
>>> > Best,
>>> >
>>> > Rafik
>>> >
>>> > <2014-8-28-SO-AC-SG-leaders.pdf>
>>>
>>
>>