Hi, I think they both say a similar thing. - the greater ICANN accountability is seperate - accountability related to IANA is in scope avri On 13-Aug-14 17:01, Milton L Mueller wrote: > I am wondering why this statement on accountability seems to assume > that there is "no linkage" between ICANN accountability and IANA > accountability, when, in fact, there is. > > "Any linkages between the work of the CWG on the IANA transition and > the broader ICANN Accountability Review Process with regard to ICANN > policy are outside the scope of this group's work. Accountability for > the administration of the IANA functions (i.e., implementation and > operational accountability), however, is properly within the scope of > this working group." > > The ICG charter handled this relationship in a much better way: > > " The IANA stewardship transition process is taking place alongside a > parallel and related process on enhancing ICANN accountability. While > maintaining the accountability of Internet identifier governance is > central to both processes, this group's scope is focused on the > arrangements required for the continuance of IANA functions in an > accountable and widely accepted manner after the expiry of the > NTIA-ICANN contract. Nevertheless, the two processes are interrelated > and interdependent and should appropriately coordinate their work." > > --MM > >> -----Original Message----- From: NCSG-Discuss >> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Avri Doria >> Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2014 1:42 PM To: >> [log in to unmask] Subject: [NCSG-Discuss] Fwd: >> [CWG-DT-Stewardship] Final Draft Charter >> >> >> Next step is SOAC chartering organization review and hopefully >> approval so we can actually start the work. >> >> avri >> >> >> >> -------- Original Message -------- Subject: [CWG-DT-Stewardship] >> Final Draft Charter >> >> >> >> Hi all, Attached is the final version of the draft charter. > >