Thanks so much for pushing this Bill. Your efforts at trying to open things up are greatly appreciated.
 
Ed
 
-----Original Message-----
From: William Drake <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask]
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2014 09:34:21 +0200
Subject: Re: ICANN Community Issues Unprecedented Letter Questioning ICANN's Proposed Accountability Process

Hi Adam
 
On Aug 29, 2014, at 6:54 AM, Adam < [log in to unmask]> wrote:
 
Anyone have a link to the SO/AC leadership mail archive?
I have suggested on the list that it should be publicly archived and got no response.
 
Bill
 
From: William Drake <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Re: Archive Question Regarding SO-AC Mailing List
Date: August 8, 2014 at 9:56:44 AM GMT+2
To: Robert Hoggarth <[log in to unmask] >
 
Hi Rob
 
Thanks for your swift reply.  Yes, things can get lost to the shifting sands of ICANN history….
 
My personal view would be that there’s no reason for the list to not be publicly archived.  For us, it would allow searching back to previous messages/threads when desired to reconstruct not only the background of current discussions and decisions, but also to see what previous groups of chairs may have done that could be relevant.  I use list archives in these manners all the time, and find the lack of that option here a bit frustrating.  And for the community, it would provide transparency and accountability, always good things that we advocate elsewhere.  In the event there is a particular decision that is really sensitive and needs to be worked out privately before something comes to the list, constructing a Cc like this works fine.
 
When I was on the GNSO Council I pushed for opening up our meetings via webcast and Adobe and the result has hardly been a massive number of observers or disruptions.  But for those addictive personalities who want to know what their elected reps are up to, it has been a good thing. I would expect the same would apply here.
 
Would indeed be good to hear from others.
 
Bill