[log in to unmask]" type="cite">> -----Original Message-----
> From: [log in to unmask] [mailto:ncuc-discuss-
> [log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Kathy Kleiman
> Sent: Sunday, August 24, 2014 10:51 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: [NCUC-DISCUSS] NCUC Delegate to the 2015 NomCom
>
> All,
> My gut sense says that we should study this proposal closely. It gives an awful
> lot of weight and votes to Supporting Organizations that do not, themselves,
> allow ICANN a role in their governance (ASO, ccNSO), but would now be having
> a much greater weight in appointing representatives to our governance (namely
> the Board and its work with GNSO issues). The implications could be astounding.
>
> I recommend that we talk more. I would value the review and input of those
> who served on the Nominating Committee, those who have a strong knowledge
> of the other supporting organizations, and everyone.
>
> Like the proposal to change the GAC's power, this is one with great implications
> for the GNSO.
> Best,
> Kathy
> p.s. how does 5 GNSO representatives but only 3 votes mean? Can anyone
> previously on the NomCom talk about some complexities that might add
> (currently I think it is one rep, one vote).
>