I agree, designating a volunteer who is responsible for the process
for various exercises is a great idea. The Chair has a ton of
processes to manage, and the PC structure and procedures seems to me
(as a member) could use a little brainstorming.
Kind regards.
Stephanie
On 2014-08-30, 8:16, Sam Lanfranco
wrote:
[log in to unmask]" type="cite">
We can consider this a well-intended judgement call on the part of
the Chair, but it did compromised the integrity of process within
NCSG. I can understand the pressure of the time deadline and there
is little to gain from being harsh here, but we should learn from
this episode.
........
Again, the main lesson here should be that in the heat of the
preliminary discussions NCSG should designate someone (a
volunteer) to act as the drafting person to formulate possible
text in case NCSG decides to make a submission, and to maintain
communication links with other constituencies for collaborative
action. That would have
been easy to do in this instance.