I also agree that staff are good people. However I believe what most is concerned about is getting staff in a bottom-up manner. I will be surprised if someone is accusing the person of individual staff but rather it's more of questioning their act (which they may have done in all honesty and in the interest of making progress).
If indeed ICANN is trying to be bottom-up as much as possible then it has to been evident through it's actions
Cheers!
sent from Google nexus 4
kindly excuse brevity and typos.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Have decided that for me the best solution is to withdraw from the
conversation on this issue. I said what i had to say, I fought for
what I believe in to the end, I lost, I will move on.
But one one point I feel I must comment:
On 30-Aug-14 15:22, Edward Morris wrote:
> I don’t believe that is necessarily true of certain members of the
> ICANN staff in their actions on other matters.
I have been working with these people for years. With one or two
possible exceptions, and I am not even sure about those, staff is full
of nice, well meaning caring people. Yes, I have had my differences
with them as I do with all people from time to time - it is in my
nature, but they > "are good people acting in good faith."
In our dealings with them, we might do a wee bit better if we learned
to work with them instead of treating like the creatures from the lagoon.
avri
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (MingW32)
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUAd2mAAoJEOo+L8tCe36HHbMIALuzMgYpCpa/ccJdYLvG/DGb
uyhrx7BR8pokhYIfhaVthiAz4TDvmARrT3IdhpCe18Mu0jPYpO+MXq+D86lafzK5
xF66oEyIX2gPM04zVjkWslKT+JTVo7MYl8Y7EDevzqGv8YINpOrwqHVwfmdnO1rE
FbNKly1RyBqiVv8GOy/jpAXedaTvOATdWTzfdh2X/Eqqhqw13JxDKkLo5NBPYfrj
+E9Nnoo2sivWgNduh/um1L08QpGCkv06pDhQpvRPknhQ7FR4xYYfHy46ANftiRNO
DUct+o+pgYnqcemdCe7Y2yizX6tT0m5D8ONa9iVUm2mtTXI7wyLWTzir3agT7/A=
=wcI8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----