There is an issue here. The IGF is larger than and apart from NCSG.
More than just NCSG folk need to be involved in refining the
proposal to give it, at least, the bare bones of how it would
operate. That includes how it would link to regional IGFs, as well
as funding, accountability, monitoring and evaluation....to keep it
on a good track. The new "neutral website" for this effort at
www.igfcontinuation.org is only designed to accept sign-ons of
organizations,
countries, and individuals.
What sort of electronic venue (wiki?) is being considered so that
the rest of the world's stakeholders, beyond NCSG, can participate
in the framing dialogue that refines the recommendation?