On 26 Sep 2014 04:03, "Norbert Klein" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

If NCSG is the only one not yet signed, and as it seems in line with our concern, I suggest that we do not try to make changes, but join all the others with the present text.

Norbert Klein
Cambodia

=

On 9/26/2014 9:58 AM, Robin Gross wrote:

Actually, the stmt is being signed by the Registry Stakeholder Group, the Registrar Stakeholder Group, the Business Constituency, the IP Constituency, and the ISP Constituency.  So NCSG is the only other part of the GNSO.

Best,
Robin

On Sep 25, 2014, at 7:48 PM, Adam wrote:

On Sep 26, 2014, at 7:31 AM, Robin Gross wrote:

Thanks for passing this along, Rafik.  I think this draft cross community submission is great and addresses many of the concerns we had previously raised with ICANN's current accountability plan.  It also proposes a few concrete suggestions for improving this process.  I hope NCSG will endorse this cross community statement.

Robin,

the statement's from the Registries Stakeholder Group (RySG) not cross constituency.

Adam

Is there support from others as well?

Thanks,
Robin


Begin forwarded message:

From: Rafik Dammak <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: [PC-NCSG] Joint SO-AC-SG-C Submission on ICANN's Enhancing ICANN Accountabitliy Plan / Registries comments
Date: September 25, 2014 7:09:46 AM PDT
To: NCSG-Policy <[log in to unmask]>

Hi everyone,

you find attached the comment from registries SG for the accountability public comment and they are proposing several recommendations
Keith their representative is asking if we would like to develop a joint SO/AC/SG statement.

Best Regards,

Rafik

<ICANN RySG Accountability Response v10 23 2014 Clean.docx>

_______________________________________________
PC-NCSG mailing list
[log in to unmask]
http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg